Why “Give It Enough Time” Is Not a Scientific Explanation

Why “Give It Enough Time” Is Not a Scientific Explanation

When origin-of-life explanations run into trouble, one phrase reliably appears:

“Given enough time…”

It sounds scientific.

It sounds reasonable.

But it isn’t an explanation.

⸻

Time Is Not a Cause

Time does not create anything.

It does not direct processes, select outcomes, or generate information.

Time simply allows events to occur.

If a process lacks the ability to produce a result, extending the duration does not fix the problem.

Waiting longer does not turn noise into meaning.

⸻

Probability Does Not Improve With Time Alone

Random processes do not become more successful simply because they run longer.

If the probability of forming a functional sequence is astronomically low, repeating the process blindly does not make success realistic.

It merely repeats failure.

Probability must be paired with a mechanism that favors success.

⸻

Information Requires Direction

Information is not the product of randomness filtered by time.

It requires:

• Selection toward function

• Constraints that preserve meaning

• Systems that interpret symbols

Before life exists, none of these mechanisms are available.

Appealing to time without a guiding process is not science — it’s hope.

⸻

The Deeper Issue

“Enough time” often functions as a placeholder for missing explanations.

It acknowledges that we don’t know how something happened — while assuming it must have happened anyway.

That’s not how scientific explanations work.

Science explains how, not merely that.

⸻

A Better Question

Instead of asking how much time is needed, the real question is:

What physical process creates information?

Until that question is answered, time remains irrelevant.

⸻